|
These letters are gems, some of which should have been included in Reagan: A Life In Letters. Mr. As a historian (BA, BYU '95), I have an eye and a nose for the primary sources. But, apparently, the Reagans were fine with the flirtations.One key letter was included, the outlining of the abortive attempt for WFB and Rush Limbaugh (The Way Things Ought to Be) to hold a celebration for the Gipper in 1994 (p. I was expecting a different book.
Lewis: The Gift of Friendship).That many the lesson for all of us, regardless of our political stripes. It highlights the relationship, despite disagreements, is above all.And an enviable relationship it was, rivaling Lewis and Tolkien's great friendship (Tolkien and C.S. 234ff). Two men--the rarified academic and the citizen-politician--coming together, and sometimes disagreeing, but still keeping their friendship in tact. *Buckley's mock appointment as Ambassador to Afghanistan--this was an ad nausium joke in WFB's letters.*The intimate--even flirtatious--letters WFB wrote to Nancy.Indeed, these letters to Nancy were rather shocking, considering the Reagans' proverbially tight relationship, and Nancy's well-know antenna for detecting frauds and shysters. But in a larger sense, it is about camaraderie. Canal. This was the beginning of the end, with the announcement of the Alzheimer's eight months later.So this book is a useful part of Reganalia, tracking him from pre-Gubernatorial days to his passing.
Instead of a solid memoir, this book is a series of snapshot reminisces mixed in with the volley of correspondence between WFB and the Gipper.And it was the epistolary aspect that engaged me the most. Limbaugh has referenced it several times, and both have cited Nancy's poignant response "Ronnie is simply not up to it" (236n). Gladly, the gems have now been restored to the crown.Here are some of the surprises:*The running joke over WFB and the Gipper's disagreement about the Panama (or is it Erie). WFB was playful--in ways that I might be with a sister-in-law, but never with another man's wife.
Reagan's ability to tune people out with early signs of Alzheimer's.So, if you already know Ronald Reagan, and you want an inside look at the man, written by a close personal friend, then this is the book for you. Buckley's observations on people confusing Mr. I particularly found Mr.
Buckley Jr. The book is not a biography of Reagan, but it was not intended to be one. In this book, author and political thinker William F.
As a series of reminisces, though, it is quite interesting. I am glad that I read this book, and I do not hesitate to recommend it. reminisces about that great American Conservative, Ronald Wilson Reagan.
The book takes the form of a mixture of letters exchanged by Reagan and Buckley, and remembrances of meetings between the two.Overall, I found the book to be somewhat lightweight.
The book covers over thirty years of friendship between two political giants through original text and re-printed correspondence. The book also offers a peek into the personal lives of the Reagan and Buckley families. As a great admirer of Ronald Reagan, I found this book to be a very informative and enjoyable read and I regret that Mr. It offers insight into some of Reagan's most important positions on government, the economy and foreign policy, particularly concerning the Soviet Union. I recommed it to anyone with an interest in the Reagan legacy. Buckley was not able to speak publicly about the book before his death. It is an intimate, behind-the-scenes chronicle of the relationship between WFB and Ronald and Nancy Reagan.
Still, for two afternoons in the library, it was a worthwhile read. While I would be as harsh as the gentleman who noted, "The book strikes me as awfully lazy, a pastiche of vignettes, letters, and transcripts," there is some validity in the latter part of that qualm. I'd recommend it to folks who seek to learn more about one of our great president; one I was raised under. This book, published after WFB's death, is a decent and quick read. It DOES give the reader some insight into Reagan, as expected from personal correspondence, but also lacks, as others have noted.
Well worth your time.brings lot of history to mind with what I wasliving comparing it with what these two fellows were doing. What a wonderful book.full of imformation you wouldn't know aboutwithout reading this book.
|
